If you’ve been reading my blog for a while, you probably already know that I have an interest in building RPMs of CPAN modules. I run a small RPM repository where I make available all of the RPMs that I have built for myself. These will either be modules that aren’t available in other RPM repositories or modules where I wanted a newer version than the currently available one.
I’m happy to take requests for my repo, but I don’t often get any. That’s probably because most people very sensibly use the cpanminus/local::lib approach or something along those lines.
But earlier this week, I was sitting on IRC and Ilmari asked if I had a particular module available. When I said that I didn’t, he asked if I had a guide for building an RPM. I didn’t (well there are slides from YAPC 2008 – but they’re a bit dated) but I could see that it was a good suggestion. So here it is. Oh, and I built the missing RPM for him.
Setting Up
In order to build RPMs you’ll need a few things set up. This is stuff you’ll only need to do once. Firstly, you’ll need two new packages installed – cpanspec (which parses a CPAN distribution and produces a spec file) and rpm-build (which takes a spec file and a distribution and turns them into an RPM). They will be available in the standard repos for your distribution (assuming your distribution is something RPM-based like Fedora or Centos) so installing them is as simple as:
1 |
sudo yum install cpanspec rpm–build |
If you’re using Fedora 22 or later, “yum” has been replaced with “dnf”.
Next, you’ll need a directory structure in which to build your RPMs. I always have an “rpm” directory in my home directory, but it can be anywhere and called anything you like. Within that directory you will need subdirectories called BUILD, BUILDROOT, RPMS, SOURCES, SPECS and SRPMS. We’ll see what most of those are for a little later.
The final thing you’ll need is a file called “.rpmmacros” in your home directory. At a minimum, it should contain this:
1 2 3 4 5 |
%packager Your Name <you@email.com> %vendor Some Organisation %_topdir /home/you/rpm |
The packager and vendor settings are just to stop you having to type in that information every time you build an RPM. The _topdir setting points to the “rpm” directory that you created a couple of paragraphs up.
I would highly recommend adding the following line as well:
1 |
%__perl_requires %{nil} |
This turns off the default behavior for adding “Requires” data to the RPM. The standard behaviour is to parse the module’s source code looking for every “use” statement. By turning that off, you instead trust the information in the META.yml to be correct. If you’re interesting in hearing more detail about why I think the default behaviour is broken, then ask me in a pub sometime.
Ok. Now we’re all set. We can build our first RPM.
Building an RPM
Building an RPM is simple. You use “cpanspec” to make the spec file and then “rpmbuild” to build the RPM. You can use “cpanspec” in a few different modes. If you have the module tarball, then you can pass that to “cpanspec”.
1 |
cpanspec Some–Module–0.01.tar.gz |
That will unwrap the tarball, parse the code and create the spec file.
But if you’re building an RPM for a CPAN module, you don’t need to download the tarball first, “cpanspec” will do that for you if you give it a distribution name.
1 |
cpanspec Some–Module |
That will connect to CPAN, find the latest version of the distribution, download the right tarball and then do all the unwrapping, parsing and spec creation.
But there’s another, even cleverer way to use “cpanspec” and that’s the one that I use. If you only know the module’s name and you’re not sure which distribution it’s in, then you can just pass the name of the module.
1 |
cpanspec Some::Module |
This is the mode that I always use it in.
No matter how you invoke “cpanspec”, you will end up with the distribution tarball and the spec file – which will be called “perl-Some-Module.spec”. You need to copy these files into the correct directories under your rpm building directory. The tarball goes into SOURCES and the spec goes into SPECS. It’s also probably easiest if you change directory into your rpm building directory.
You can now build the RPM with this command:
1 |
rpmbuild –ba SPECS/perl–Some–Module.spec |
You’ll see a lot of output as “rpmbuild” goes through the whole CPAN module testing and building process. But hopefully eventually you’ll see some output saying that the build has succeeded and that an RPM has been written under your RPMS directory (in either the “noarch” or “x86_64” subdirectory). You can install that RPM with any of the following commands:
1 2 3 |
sudo rpm –Ivh <path–to–rpm> sudo yum localinstall <path–to–rpm> sudo dnf install <path–to–rpm> |
And that should be that. Of course there are a few things that can go wrong. And that’s what the next section is about.
Fixing Problems
There are a number of things that can go wrong when building RPMs. Here are some of the most common, along with suggested fixes.
Missing prerequisites
This is also known as “dependency hell”. The module you are building is likely to require other modules. And you will need to have those installed before “rpmbuild” will let you build the RPM (and, note, they’ll need to be installed as RPMS – the RPM database doesn’t know about modules you have installed with “cpan” or “cpanminus”).
If you have missing prerequisites, the first step is to try to install them using “yum” (or “dnf”). Sometimes you will get lucky, other times the prerequisites won’t exist in the repos that you’re using and you will have to build them yourself. This is the point at which building an RPM for a single module suddenly spirals into three hours of painstaking work as you struggle to keep track of how far down the rabbit-hole you have gone.
I keep thinking that I should build a tool which parses the prerequisites, works out which ones already exist and automatically tries to build the ones that are missing. It would need to work recursively of course. I haven’t summoned the courage yet.
Extra files
Sometimes at the end of an RPM build, you’ll get an error saying that files were found which weren’t listed in the spec file. This usually means that the distribution contains programs that “cpanspec” didn’t find and therefore didn’t add to the spec file. This is a simple fix. Open the spec file in an editor and look for the section labelled ‘%files’. Usually, it will look something like this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
%files %defattr(–,root,root,–) %doc AUTHORS Changes GitGuide.md LICENSE META.json %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/* |
This is a list of the files which will be added to the RPM. See the _mandir entry? That’s the man page for the module that is generated from the module’s Pod (section 3 is where library documentation goes). We just need to add two lines to the bottom of this section:
1 2 3 |
%{_bindir}/* %{_mandir}/man1/* |
This says “add any files you find in the binaries directories (and also any man pages you find for those programs)”.
If you add these lines and re-run the “rpmbuild” command, the build should now succeed.
Missing header files
If you’re building an XS module that is a wrapped around a C library then you will also need the C header files for that library in order to compile the XS files. If you get errors about missing definitions, then this is probably the problem. In RedHat-land a C library called “mycoolthing” will live in an RPM called “libmycoolthing” and the headers will be in an RPM library called “libmycoolthing-devel”. You will need both of those installed.
Your users, however, will only need the C library (libmycoolthing) installed. It’s well worth telling the RPM system that this external library is required by adding the following line to the spec file:
1 |
Requires: libmycoolthing |
That way, when people install your module using “yum” or “dnf”, it will pull in the correct C library too. “cpanspec” will automatically generate “Requires” lines for other Perl RPMs, but it can’t do it for libraries that aren’t declared in the META.yml file.
So that’s it. A basic guide to building RPMs from CPAN distributions. There’s a lot more detail that I could cover, but this should be enough to work for 80-90% of the modules that you will want to build.
If you have any questions, then please leave a comment below.
Leave a Reply